Smaller text Restore text size Larger text
CHANGE FONT

Great Idea OZ

By Hayden | Permalink | Comments No Comments | February 20th, 2007 | Trackback


While I was reading this article, Australia to ban old-style bulbs, I was reminded that lighting is a high percentage of our energy consumption.

As consumers we are always trying to find the best deal so to some having to switch from ordinary bulbs to the Compact Fluorescents(CF) seems extreme. They are expencive usually two to three times or more than incandescent bulbs. But that cost is negated many times over when you look at the life expectancy of the CF lights, the energy savings per month they are in use, and the decreased environmental impact associated with the CF light bulbs.

The decreased environmental impact is multi-benefiting. The lights themselves use energy. There is heat generated by incandescent light which is wasted energy and means increased cooling needs in hotter months.

So is that initial cost really that much?





Post your comment

This is a captcha-picture. It is used to prevent mass-access by robots. (see: www.captcha.net)
To prevent automated spam appearing on this blog, we ask you to demonstrate your human-ness by entering the 5 character code in the space provided. If you cannot decipher the characters, click "Generate a new image" for a new set.

 
 

  

It sounds like SK2 has recently been updated on this blog. But not fully configured. You MUST visit Spam Karma's admin page at least once before letting it filter your comments (chaos may ensue otherwise).


Monthly Archives

Latest Forum Discussions



© BootsnAll Travel Network - All rights reserved

BootsnAll Travel Network
 
Add this blog to: MyYahoo, Google, Bloglines, My AOL, RSS